DENAXE LIMITED v PAUL COOPER & Anor
Costs of the sale claim and abandoned peripheral claims to be paid by the claimant on an indemnity basis; 75% of defendants’ costs of the application to be paid by the claimant on an indemnity basis, with a 25% reduction to reflect partial success by the claimant on some arguments.
- Parties
- Claimant: Denaxe Limited; Defendant: Paul Cooper; Defendant: David Rubin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Strike Out Application Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Costs ruling in favour of defendants with partial reduction.
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out, Abuse of Process, Indemnity Costs, Summary Judgment, Res Judicata
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denaxe Limited
Claimant
Paul Cooper
Defendant
David Rubin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Strike Out Application Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be paid on an indemnity basis for the sale claim and abandoned peripheral claims
- 2 Appropriate basis and percentage for costs of the application
- 3 Entitlement to payment on account of costs
Ratio Decidendi
Costs of the sale claim and abandoned peripheral claims to be paid by the claimant on an indemnity basis; 75% of defendants’ costs of the application to be paid by the claimant on an indemnity basis, with a 25% reduction to reflect partial success by the claimant on some arguments.
Court Disposition
Costs ruling in favour of defendants with partial reduction.
Orders
- Claimant to pay costs of sale claim and abandoned peripheral claims on indemnity basis.
- Claimant to pay 75% of defendants’ costs of the application on indemnity basis, subject to 25% reduction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment