Devon, R. v
The court found the fresh evidence from Stanley Washington incapable of belief and declined to admit it. The exclusion of the police Altaris log was an error, but it did not render the conviction unsafe as the jury was aware of its contents. The identification evidence against the appellant was strong, and no reasonable explanation was provided for not adducing other evidence at trial. The convictions were safe and the appeals were dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Devon; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, Harassment, Fresh Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Identification Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Devon
Appellant
Regina (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted under section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968
- 2 Whether the exclusion of the police Altaris log was an error
- 3 Whether the conviction on count 1 (perverting the course of justice) was unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the fresh evidence from Stanley Washington incapable of belief and declined to admit it. The exclusion of the police Altaris log was an error, but it did not render the conviction unsafe as the jury was aware of its contents. The identification evidence against the appellant was strong, and no reasonable explanation was provided for not adducing other evidence at trial. The convictions were safe and the appeals were dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction on count 1 dismissed.
- Renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction on count 2 dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment