Rufus v Elliott
The press release is capable of bearing a defamatory meaning because it implies the Claimant acted disloyally by making public a private text message, and right-thinking members of society might consider such conduct as lowering the Claimant's reputation, especially as the disclosure was not to relevant authorities but to the public.
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Rufus; Defendant: Paul Elliott
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Claim / Application for Determination of Defamatory Meaning and Strike Out
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; statement is capable of being defamatory
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Defamatory Meaning, Innuendo, Right Thinking Members of Society, Informer Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Rufus
Claimant
Paul Elliott
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Claim / Application for Determination of Defamatory Meaning and Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the press release is capable of bearing a defamatory meaning against the Claimant
- 2 Whether right-thinking members of society would consider the alleged conduct as lowering the Claimant's reputation
Ratio Decidendi
The press release is capable of bearing a defamatory meaning because it implies the Claimant acted disloyally by making public a private text message, and right-thinking members of society might consider such conduct as lowering the Claimant's reputation, especially as the disclosure was not to relevant authorities but to the public.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; statement is capable of being defamatory
Orders
- The claim is not struck out; the statement is capable of bearing a defamatory meaning attributed to it in the Particulars of Claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment