Dadourian Group International Inc & Ors v Simms & Ors
Privilege does not attach to the Eagle documents because Mr Simms was not a qualified solicitor at the relevant time and the Defendants knew this; privilege was also waived by disclosure of related documents. The fraud exception applies to documents relating to the Brinton by-laws due to a strong prima facie case of misleading the court. DGI is permitted to use the Eagle documents; applications to restrain their use are dismissed. Disclosure of funding sources is refused absent evidence of breach of freezing orders.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dadourian Group International Inc; Claimant: Alex Dadourian; Claimant: Haig Dadourian; Defendant: Paul Francis Simms; Defendant: Jack Dadourian; Defendant: Helga Dadourian; Defendant: Corporate Defendants (Azuri, Libourne, Ardales, Republic)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Litigation / Post Trial Interlocutory Applications Regarding Disclosure and Privilege
- Outcome
- Applications by Defendants for injunctions dismissed; DGI's application to use Eagle documents granted; application for disclosure of funding source dismissed; order for letters of authority to be made if not already provided.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Fraud Exception to Privilege, Disclosure of Documents, Freezing Orders, Beneficial Ownership, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dadourian Group International Inc
Claimant
Alex Dadourian
Claimant
Haig Dadourian
Claimant
Paul Francis Simms
Defendant
Jack Dadourian
Defendant
Helga Dadourian
Defendant
Corporate Defendants (Azuri, Libourne, Ardales, Republic)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Litigation / Post Trial Interlocutory Applications Regarding Disclosure and Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the Eagle documents privileged from disclosure?
- 2 Has privilege been waived or lost due to fraud?
- 3 Should DGI be permitted to use the Eagle documents?
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege does not attach to the Eagle documents because Mr Simms was not a qualified solicitor at the relevant time and the Defendants knew this; privilege was also waived by disclosure of related documents. The fraud exception applies to documents relating to the Brinton by-laws due to a strong prima facie case of misleading the court. DGI is permitted to use the Eagle documents; applications to restrain their use are dismissed. Disclosure of funding sources is refused absent evidence of breach of freezing orders.
Court Disposition
Applications by Defendants for injunctions dismissed; DGI's application to use Eagle documents granted; application for disclosure of funding source dismissed; order for letters of authority to be made if not already provided.
Orders
- McKinnon J’s order of 7 June 2007 varied to permit DGI to adduce Eagle documents in evidence.
- Applications for injunctions restraining use of Eagle documents dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment