Dadourian Group International & Anor v Simms & Ors
Permission of the court is required to use evidence obtained under cross-examination subject to undertakings for the purposes of a summary judgment application. The court should grant permission where it is just and convenient in all the circumstances. In this case, the applicant's reasons for seeking to use the material are compelling, there is no legitimate opposition from the person protected by the undertaking, and the evidence is relevant to the issues before the court.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dadourian Group International; Claimant: Alex Dadourian (Personal representative of Haig Dadourian, Deceased); Defendant: Paul Francis Simms; Defendant: Selim Rahman; Defendant: Jack Dadourian; Defendant: Helga Dadourian; Defendant: Michael A Parker; Defendant: Paul S Shaerf; Defendant: G Andrew Couch; Defendant: Guy W Vincent; Defendant: Robert A Perrin; Defendant: Andrew M Smith; Defendant: Azuri Limited; Defendant: Brinton Establishment (formerly Wildhorse Establishment); Defendant: Libourne Investments Limited; Defendant: Ardales Investments Limited; Defendant: Republic Investment Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Use Cross Examination Evidence in Support of Summary Judgment and Related Applications
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Use of Evidence From Cross Examination, Variation of Court Undertakings, Legal Professional Privilege, Freezing Orders, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dadourian Group International
Claimant
Alex Dadourian (Personal representative of Haig Dadourian, Deceased)
Claimant
Paul Francis Simms
Defendant
Selim Rahman
Defendant
Jack Dadourian
Defendant
Helga Dadourian
Defendant
Michael A Parker
Defendant
Paul S Shaerf
Defendant
G Andrew Couch
Defendant
Guy W Vincent
Defendant
Robert A Perrin
Defendant
Andrew M Smith
Defendant
Azuri Limited
Defendant
Brinton Establishment (formerly Wildhorse Establishment)
Defendant
Libourne Investments Limited
Defendant
Ardales Investments Limited
Defendant
Republic Investment Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Use Cross Examination Evidence in Support of Summary Judgment and Related Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission is required to use evidence obtained under cross-examination for the purposes of a summary judgment application and related interlocutory matters
- 2 Whether the undertakings given to the court restrict such use
- 3 Whether the court should grant permission to use the evidence in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Permission of the court is required to use evidence obtained under cross-examination subject to undertakings for the purposes of a summary judgment application. The court should grant permission where it is just and convenient in all the circumstances. In this case, the applicant's reasons for seeking to use the material are compelling, there is no legitimate opposition from the person protected by the undertaking, and the evidence is relevant to the issues before the court.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Permission granted to DGI to use the cross-examination evidence of Mr Simms for the purposes of the applications before the court, except for items (f) and (g) in the draft order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment