Dadourian Group International Inc & Ors v Simms & Ors [2008] EWHC 1784 (Ch) (25 July 2008)
The court held that the Eagle documents, to the extent they were created for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or in the conduct of litigation, are subject to legal professional or litigation privilege unless the privilege is vitiated by fraud. The evidence established that Mr Simms intentionally misled the court regarding the by-laws of Brinton, but there was insufficient evidence that Mr and Mrs Dadourian knowingly participated in the deception. Therefore, privilege attaches to the documents except where they evidence or further a fraud. The court will permit use of the Eagle documents only to the extent they are not privileged or are admissible under the fraud exception. The order...
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 1784 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Dadourian Group International Inc; Claimant: Alex Dadourian; Claimant: Haig Dadourian; Defendant: Paul Francis Simms & Ors; Defendant: Corporate Defendants (Azuri Limited, Libourne, Ardales, Republic, Brinton Establishment)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Litigation / Post Trial, Interlocutory Applications Regarding Use of Documents and Privilege
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part, refused in part
- Legal Topics
- Privilege (legal Professional and Litigation), Confidentiality, Disclosure of Documents, Freezing Orders, Trust Beneficial Ownership, Fraud and Deceit, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dadourian Group International Inc
Claimant
Alex Dadourian
Claimant
Haig Dadourian
Claimant
Paul Francis Simms & Ors
Defendant
Corporate Defendants (Azuri Limited, Libourne, Ardales, Republic, Brinton Establishment)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Litigation / Post Trial, Interlocutory Applications Regarding Use of Documents and Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Eagle documents are subject to legal professional or litigation privilege and/or confidentiality
- 2 Whether DGI may use the Eagle documents in proceedings despite prior court orders
- 3 Whether the Corporate Defendants' assets are beneficially owned by Jack and Helga Dadourian
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Eagle documents, to the extent they were created for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or in the conduct of litigation, are subject to legal professional or litigation privilege unless the privilege is vitiated by fraud. The evidence established that Mr Simms intentionally misled the court regarding the by-laws of Brinton, but there was insufficient evidence that Mr and Mrs Dadourian knowingly participated in the deception. Therefore, privilege attaches to the documents except where they evidence or further a fraud. The court will permit use of the Eagle documents only to the extent they are not privileged or are admissible under the fraud exception. The order...
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part, refused in part
Orders
- Injunction granted restraining use of privileged Eagle documents except as permitted by the court
- Order of 7 June 2007 varied to allow use of non-privileged Eagle documents in these proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment