R v Paul Gellen

R v Paul Gellen

There were no arguable grounds for appeal as the applicant was competently represented, all relevant evidence was before the jury or could have been adduced at trial, the alleged fresh evidence was not material or was available at trial, and no procedural or substantive unfairness was established.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Paul Gellen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal, Application to Adduce Fresh Evidence, and Application to Amend Grounds of Appeal
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Appeals, Fresh Evidence, Adverse Publicity, Jury Directions, Legal Representation
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Appeals Fresh Evidence Adverse Publicity Jury Directions Legal Representation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Paul Gellen

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal, Application to Adduce Fresh Evidence, and Application to Amend Grounds of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there were arguable grounds for appeal against conviction for sexual offences
  2. 2 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
  3. 3 Whether there was a failure to disclose relevant evidence

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds for appeal as the applicant was competently represented, all relevant evidence was before the jury or could have been adduced at trial, the alleged fresh evidence was not material or was available at trial, and no procedural or substantive unfairness was established.

Court Disposition

applications refused