Paul Hopkins v The Information Commissioner & Anor.
The strike out of the appeal was based on a procedural irregularity; the Tribunal exercised its power to set aside the previous decision and, upon fresh consideration, refused the strike out, allowing the matter to proceed to final determination.
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Hopkins; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Chief Constable Staffordshire Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Information Rights Appeal / Case Management Directions
- Outcome
- Strike out refused; appeal to proceed to final determination.
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Irregularity, Strike Out Applications, Case Management, Determination on Papers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Hopkins
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Chief Constable Staffordshire Police
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Case Management Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the strike out of the appeal should stand
- 2 Whether the application for set aside should be allowed
- 3 Whether the matter should proceed to final determination
Ratio Decidendi
The strike out of the appeal was based on a procedural irregularity; the Tribunal exercised its power to set aside the previous decision and, upon fresh consideration, refused the strike out, allowing the matter to proceed to final determination.
Court Disposition
Strike out refused; appeal to proceed to final determination.
Orders
- First Respondent's application for set aside permitted out of time.
- Decision dated 1 March 2023 set aside; Registrar's strike out stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment