Cattle v Evans & Anor (Rev 1)
The claimant did not establish any agreement or understanding giving rise to a constructive trust in the Cross Hands property. However, as a cohabitant under section 1(1)(ba) of the 1975 Act, the law of intestacy did not make reasonable financial provision for her maintenance. The court ordered provision for housing up to £110,000, held on trust for the defendants subject to the claimant's right to reside.
- Parties
- Claimant: Christina Cattle; Defendant: Paul John Evans; Defendant: Gareth Evans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for constructive trust dismissed; claim for reasonable financial provision under the 1975 Act allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, Constructive Trust, Reasonable Financial Provision, Intestacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christina Cattle
Claimant
Paul John Evans
Defendant
Gareth Evans
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant has a beneficial interest in the Cross Hands property under a constructive trust
- 2 Whether the disposition of the deceased's estate by intestacy makes reasonable financial provision for the claimant under the 1975 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant did not establish any agreement or understanding giving rise to a constructive trust in the Cross Hands property. However, as a cohabitant under section 1(1)(ba) of the 1975 Act, the law of intestacy did not make reasonable financial provision for her maintenance. The court ordered provision for housing up to £110,000, held on trust for the defendants subject to the claimant's right to reside.
Court Disposition
Claim for constructive trust dismissed; claim for reasonable financial provision under the 1975 Act allowed in part.
Orders
- Payment from the estate for the purchase of a new home for the claimant at a price not exceeding £110,000 and costs incidental to purchase.
- Property to be held on trust for the defendants subject to the claimant's right to reside for as long as she wishes, provided she insures the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment