Capita ATL Pension Trustees Ltd & Anor v Gellately & Ors

Capita ATL Pension Trustees Ltd & Anor v Gellately & Ors

The 1991 and 1995 amendments to the Scheme were invalid due to non-compliance with formal amendment procedures. No free-standing power existed to alter NRD for all members without formalities. The 1995 Announcement did not create binding contract or estoppel except possibly for members who signed and returned the acknowledgement form, but even then, no binding effect was found. Restitution for overpayments and underpayments is appropriate. Identification of British Rail Members is valid for Scheme administration.

Parties
Claimant: Capita ATL Pension Trustees Limited; Claimant: David William Stocks; Defendant: Paul John Gellately; Defendant: Sea Containers Limited (in Liquidation); Defendant: SCXCT Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Declarations granted as sought; amendments held invalid; directions issued for restitution and administration.
Legal Topics
Scheme Amendment Validity, Equalisation of Pension Ages, Restitution, Estoppel, Contract Formation, Benjamin Order
Pensions Trusts Insolvency Scheme Amendment Validity Equalisation of Pension Ages Restitution Estoppel Contract Formation +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Capita ATL Pension Trustees Limited

Claimant

David William Stocks

Claimant

Paul John Gellately

Defendant

Sea Containers Limited (in Liquidation)

Defendant

SCXCT Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Validity of 1991 and 1995 amendments to pension scheme
  2. 2 Existence and exercise of power to alter normal retirement date (NRD)
  3. 3 Binding effect of 1995 Announcement by contract or estoppel

Ratio Decidendi

The 1991 and 1995 amendments to the Scheme were invalid due to non-compliance with formal amendment procedures. No free-standing power existed to alter NRD for all members without formalities. The 1995 Announcement did not create binding contract or estoppel except possibly for members who signed and returned the acknowledgement form, but even then, no binding effect was found. Restitution for overpayments and underpayments is appropriate. Identification of British Rail Members is valid for Scheme administration.

Court Disposition

Declarations granted as sought; amendments held invalid; directions issued for restitution and administration.

Orders

  • Declarations that 1991 and 1995 amendments are invalid.
  • Order for restitution of overpaid contributions with compound interest at 5.3%.