Kowalski, R. v

Kowalski, R. v

The appellant's progress in custody, cessation of alcohol use, positive engagement with offenders of various backgrounds, and completion of relevant courses justified the conclusion that he no longer represented a risk of significant harm to the public. The extended sentence was quashed and replaced with a determinate sentence.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Paul Kowalski
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Dangerousness Assessment, Extended Sentence, Assault, Grievous Bodily Harm
Criminal Law Sentencing Dangerousness Assessment Extended Sentence Assault Grievous Bodily Harm

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Paul Kowalski

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was correctly assessed as dangerous under section 229(3) Criminal Justice Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether the extended sentence was appropriate given the appellant's progress and circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's progress in custody, cessation of alcohol use, positive engagement with offenders of various backgrounds, and completion of relevant courses justified the conclusion that he no longer represented a risk of significant harm to the public. The extended sentence was quashed and replaced with a determinate sentence.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • extended sentence quashed
  • substituted with 18 months imprisonment