Lowe, R v
Although there were aspects of the judge's summing-up that could be criticised, particularly regarding the right to silence and the scope of adverse inferences, these did not render the verdict unsafe given the overwhelming evidence and the overall adequacy of the directions.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Paul Lowe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Reference From Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy to Supply Controlled Drugs, Adverse Inferences, Right to Silence, Judicial Directions, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Section 34
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Paul Lowe
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Reference From Criminal Cases Review Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury regarding adverse inferences under section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 were adequate and compliant with legal principles
- 2 Whether the failure to remind the jury of the defendant's right to remain silent rendered the trial unfair and the verdict unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
Although there were aspects of the judge's summing-up that could be criticised, particularly regarding the right to silence and the scope of adverse inferences, these did not render the verdict unsafe given the overwhelming evidence and the overall adequacy of the directions.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
- No certification of point of law of public importance to the House of Lords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment