Probert v Moore
The defendant was negligent by driving at a speed in excess of 50 mph on a narrow country road, failing to reduce speed for oncoming traffic and not keeping a proper lookout for pedestrians. The claimant, a 13-year-old child, did not contribute to the accident as her actions did not fall below the standard expected of an ordinary child of her age.
- Parties
- Claimant: Bethany Probert (A Child by her Litigation Friend and Mother Joanna Probert); Defendant: Paul Moore
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant; damages to be assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accident, Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Duty of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bethany Probert (A Child by her Litigation Friend and Mother Joanna Probert)
Claimant
Paul Moore
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in driving on Abthorpe Road
- 2 Whether the claimant contributed to the accident (contributory negligence)
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was negligent by driving at a speed in excess of 50 mph on a narrow country road, failing to reduce speed for oncoming traffic and not keeping a proper lookout for pedestrians. The claimant, a 13-year-old child, did not contribute to the accident as her actions did not fall below the standard expected of an ordinary child of her age.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant; damages to be assessed.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal on contributory negligence refused.
- If parties cannot agree consequential orders, matter to be relisted for directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment