Rigby, R v

Rigby, R v

The original sentence of 3 years was manifestly excessive given the Level 1 categorisation of the robbery, the mitigating factors, and the appropriate reduction for a guilty plea; a sentence of 2 years and 3 months was substituted.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Paul Rigby
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing Guidelines, Appeal Against Sentence, Mitigation, Aggravating Factors
Criminal Law Robbery Sentencing Guidelines Appeal Against Sentence Mitigation Aggravating Factors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Paul Rigby

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for robbery was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines Council's Definitive Guideline on robbery
  3. 3 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigation and the guilty plea

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence of 3 years was manifestly excessive given the Level 1 categorisation of the robbery, the mitigating factors, and the appropriate reduction for a guilty plea; a sentence of 2 years and 3 months was substituted.

Court Disposition

sentence reduced

Orders

  • Original sentence of 3 years quashed
  • Substituted sentence of 2 years and 3 months imprisonment