Dadourian Group International Inc & Ors v Simms & Ors
The court held that the consent order made against Ms Eagle does not directly require third parties to deliver up documents or copies received or made by them prior to learning of the order. However, deployment of the material by third parties after learning of the order may amount to contempt of court if such deployment would have a significant and adverse effect on the Queen’s Bench action, which is the purpose the order seeks to protect. Unless and until the court is satisfied that deployment would not be contempt, the material is not to be relied upon by the Claimants in these proceedings.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dadourian Group International Inc.; Claimant: Alex Dadourian; Claimant: Haig Dadourian; Defendant: Paul Simms; Defendant: Selim Rahman; Defendant: Jack Dadourian; Defendant: Helga Dadourian; Defendant: Michael A Conlon; Defendant: Paul S Shaerf; Defendant: G Andrew Couch; Defendant: Michael A Parker; Defendant: Guy W Vincent; Defendant: Robert A Perrin; Defendant: Andrew M Smith; Defendant: Azuri Limited; Defendant: Brinton Establishment; Defendant: Libourne Investments Limited; Defendant: Ardals Investment Limited; Defendant: Republic Investment Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted (pending further hearing); Claimants restrained from deploying the material in question until further order.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Contempt of Court, Privilege, Confidential Information, Third Party Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dadourian Group International Inc.
Claimant
Alex Dadourian
Claimant
Haig Dadourian
Claimant
Paul Simms
Defendant
Selim Rahman
Defendant
Jack Dadourian
Defendant
Helga Dadourian
Defendant
Michael A Conlon
Defendant
Paul S Shaerf
Defendant
G Andrew Couch
Defendant
Michael A Parker
Defendant
Guy W Vincent
Defendant
Robert A Perrin
Defendant
Andrew M Smith
Defendant
Azuri Limited
Defendant
Brinton Establishment
Defendant
Libourne Investments Limited
Defendant
Ardals Investment Limited
Defendant
Republic Investment Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a third party is restrained by a consent order made against another party from deploying documents received in breach of confidence and/or privilege
- 2 Whether deployment of such documents would amount to contempt of court
- 3 Whether the order requires third parties to deliver up documents received prior to knowledge of the order
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the consent order made against Ms Eagle does not directly require third parties to deliver up documents or copies received or made by them prior to learning of the order. However, deployment of the material by third parties after learning of the order may amount to contempt of court if such deployment would have a significant and adverse effect on the Queen’s Bench action, which is the purpose the order seeks to protect. Unless and until the court is satisfied that deployment would not be contempt, the material is not to be relied upon by the Claimants in these proceedings.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted (pending further hearing); Claimants restrained from deploying the material in question until further order.
Orders
- Claimants (DGI and others) are not to deploy the material objected to by the Corporate Defendants and Jack and Helga Dadourian pending further hearing.
- Further directions to be given after hearing the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment