Shingleton, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 557 (02 April 2025)
The sentence of 4 months' imprisonment for disobedience to lawful command, concurrent inter se but consecutive to the 28-month sentence for sexual assault, was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle, given the high culpability, harm, and aggravating factors present.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 557
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Paul Thomas Shingleton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Disobedience to Lawful Command, Sentencing, Military Discipline
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Paul Thomas Shingleton
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 4 months' imprisonment for disobedience to lawful command was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether service detention should have been imposed instead of imprisonment for disciplinary offences after medical discharge
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 4 months' imprisonment for disobedience to lawful command, concurrent inter se but consecutive to the 28-month sentence for sexual assault, was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle, given the high culpability, harm, and aggravating factors present.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment