Williamson, R (on the application of) v Dean & Chapter Of St Paul's Cathedral & Anor [1997] EWHC Admin 784 (22nd August, 1997)
The applicant's arguments are unarguable and without reasonable grounds. The Charter's language is not gender-exclusive, and the court has no jurisdiction over doctrinal matters in the Church in Wales. The applicant lacks standing regarding the Church in Wales, and any questions at St Paul's must be referred to the Visitor. The applicant is subject to a Civil Proceedings Order for vexatious litigation, further justifying refusal of leave.
- Citation
- [1997] EWHC Admin 784
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Williamson; First Respondent: Dean and Chapter of St Paul's Cathedral; Second Respondent: Church in Wales
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Move for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Leave to move for judicial review refused; applications dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Proceedings, Ordination of Women, Locus Standi, Jurisdiction of Temporal Courts, Interpretation of Royal Charter
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Williamson
Applicant
Dean and Chapter of St Paul's Cathedral
First Respondent
Church in Wales
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Move for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable grounds for judicial review regarding the appointment of a woman as Minor Canon at St Paul's Cathedral
- 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi to challenge the ordination of women in the Church in Wales
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction over doctrinal matters in the Church in Wales
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's arguments are unarguable and without reasonable grounds. The Charter's language is not gender-exclusive, and the court has no jurisdiction over doctrinal matters in the Church in Wales. The applicant lacks standing regarding the Church in Wales, and any questions at St Paul's must be referred to the Visitor. The applicant is subject to a Civil Proceedings Order for vexatious litigation, further justifying refusal of leave.
Court Disposition
Leave to move for judicial review refused; applications dismissed.
Orders
- Refusal of leave under section 42(3) Supreme Court Act 1981 to institute proceedings
- Both applications dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment