R v Paula Marie Usherwood & Ors
The minimum terms imposed were not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle; the trial judge correctly applied statutory starting points, weighed aggravating and mitigating features, and the sentences reflected the applicants' roles and culpability in a murder arising from organised crime.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Paula Marie Usherwood; Applicant: Carla Michelle McGuire; Applicant: Leonard Glen Ward
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Minimum Term, Joint Enterprise, Organised Crime, Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Paula Marie Usherwood
Applicant
Carla Michelle McGuire
Applicant
Leonard Glen Ward
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum terms imposed for murder were manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in identifying the correct statutory starting point for minimum terms
- 3 Whether the trial judge failed to give sufficient weight to mitigation or double-counted aggravating features
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum terms imposed were not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle; the trial judge correctly applied statutory starting points, weighed aggravating and mitigating features, and the sentences reflected the applicants' roles and culpability in a murder arising from organised crime.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment