Payless Travel Ltd v Baba Krupa Holidays

Payless Travel Ltd v Baba Krupa Holidays

Payless Travel breached its implied contractual duty by failing to inform Baba Krupa of the airline's cancellation and failing to secure written assurance of reinstatement; these breaches were the effective legal causes of Baba Krupa's losses.

Parties
Appellant: Payless Travel Ltd; Respondent: Baba Krupa Holidays Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Implied Contractual Duty, Reasonable Care and Skill, Causation, Breach of Contract, Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Payless Travel Ltd

Appellant

Baba Krupa Holidays Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether Payless Travel breached its implied contractual duty to use reasonable care and skill in procuring airline tickets for Baba Krupa.
  2. 2 Whether Payless Travel's breach was the effective legal cause of Baba Krupa's losses.

Ratio Decidendi

Payless Travel breached its implied contractual duty by failing to inform Baba Krupa of the airline's cancellation and failing to secure written assurance of reinstatement; these breaches were the effective legal causes of Baba Krupa's losses.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appellant to pay costs of the appeal, subject to detailed assessment.