PD v SD & Anor
The balance of Article 8 rights falls decisively in favour of PD, who at age 16 is entitled to decide what, if any, information about his life and medical treatment is shared with his parents. It would be contrary to his welfare, privacy rights, and prospects for reconciliation to override his wishes.
- Parties
- Applicant: PD; Respondent: SD; Respondent: JD; Respondent: X County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Judgment on Application for Declaratory Relief
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief granted as sought by PD.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Rights, Article 8 ECHR, Confidentiality of Medical Information, Children's Consent to Treatment, Looked After Children, Gender Identity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PD
Applicant
SD
Respondent
JD
Respondent
X County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Judgment on Application for Declaratory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the local authority must provide information about a 16-year-old looked after child's life and medical treatment to the parents against the child's wishes
- 2 Whether the child's Article 8 rights to privacy and confidentiality override the parents' rights to information
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of Article 8 rights falls decisively in favour of PD, who at age 16 is entitled to decide what, if any, information about his life and medical treatment is shared with his parents. It would be contrary to his welfare, privacy rights, and prospects for reconciliation to override his wishes.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief granted as sought by PD.
Orders
- The local authority is not to provide information about PD's life or medical treatment to his parents without his consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment