In the matter of Peacock
Section 16(2) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 permits the High Court to take into account after-acquired assets when considering an application to increase the amount recoverable under a confiscation order. The section is not limited to assets held at the time of the original order, and the statutory language and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Peacock; Respondent: CPS Appeals Unit; Intervener: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, After Acquired Assets, Statutory Interpretation, Transitional Provisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peacock
Appellant
CPS Appeals Unit
Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 16(2) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 permits the High Court to consider after-acquired assets when increasing the amount recoverable under a confiscation order
- 2 Whether section 16 was in force at the material time given the transitional provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Ratio Decidendi
Section 16(2) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 permits the High Court to take into account after-acquired assets when considering an application to increase the amount recoverable under a confiscation order. The section is not limited to assets held at the time of the original order, and the statutory language and context support this interpretation. The Commencement Order preserves the operation of section 16 for pre-24 March 2003 offences.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Section 16(2) certificate lawfully issued; after-acquired assets to be considered in recalculating the recoverable amount under the confiscation order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment