London School of Science and Technology, R (on the application of) v Pearson Education Ltd
The withdrawal of Pearson accreditation from LSST was lawful and proportionate, as the procedures followed were fair and consistent with published policies, and the seriousness of the malpractice justified the sanction. However, the personal sanctions imposed on Dr Panagiotou were unfair, unclear, and not supported by findings or proper procedure, and must be set aside.
- Parties
- Claimant: London School of Science and Technology; Defendant: Pearson Education Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Malpractice Investigations, Sanctions, Judicial Review, Accreditation Withdrawal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London School of Science and Technology
Claimant
Pearson Education Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pearson acted unfairly and unlawfully by failing to comply with its own policies and procedures
- 2 Whether decision-makers failed to take into account relevant considerations
- 3 Whether Pearson conducted its investigations, the Malpractice Committee, and the Appeals Panel in a procedurally unfair way
Ratio Decidendi
The withdrawal of Pearson accreditation from LSST was lawful and proportionate, as the procedures followed were fair and consistent with published policies, and the seriousness of the malpractice justified the sanction. However, the personal sanctions imposed on Dr Panagiotou were unfair, unclear, and not supported by findings or proper procedure, and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed
Orders
- Sanctions imposed personally on Dr Panagiotou set aside
- Pearson to address informing LSST of the earliest date for re-application for registration and any required measures
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment