PEC Ltd v Asia Golden Rice Co Ltd
The time limit for a section 67 challenge to the tribunal's jurisdiction expired 28 days after the first tier award, as the GAFTA Rules do not allow an appeal on jurisdiction. However, an extension of time is justified due to the short delay, uncertainty regarding the time limit, and absence of prejudice to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: PEC LIMITED; Respondent: ASIA GOLDEN RICE CO LTD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Related Application / Application for Extension of Time to Challenge Arbitral Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Jurisdiction Challenge, GAFTA Rules, Section 67 Arbitration Act 1996
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PEC LIMITED
Applicant
ASIA GOLDEN RICE CO LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Related Application / Application for Extension of Time to Challenge Arbitral Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the time for making an application under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 has expired
- 2 Whether an extension of time should be granted for making such an application
Ratio Decidendi
The time limit for a section 67 challenge to the tribunal's jurisdiction expired 28 days after the first tier award, as the GAFTA Rules do not allow an appeal on jurisdiction. However, an extension of time is justified due to the short delay, uncertainty regarding the time limit, and absence of prejudice to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted
Orders
- Extension of time to apply under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is granted in terms of the draft order provided by the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment