Forest Care Home Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers & Anor [2010] EWHC 3514 (Admin) (21 December 2010)
The Council's decision to set the 2010-11 fee rate at £390 was unlawful due to its conceded error in the treatment of capital costs, and the process failed to comply with statutory and guidance requirements for transparency and proper consideration of providers' costs. The Council must reconsider and lawfully set the fee rate. The Council's actions regarding third party contributions were not amenable to public law relief in this context.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 3514 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Forest Care Home Limited; Claimant: Mavalon Limited; Claimant: Woodhill Care Limited; Respondent: Pembrokeshire County Council; Interested Party: The Welsh Ministers; Interested Party: Older People's Commissioner for Wales
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Local Authority Fee Setting, Judicial Review of Public Body Decisions, Care Home Funding, Statutory Interpretation, Government Guidance Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Forest Care Home Limited
Claimant
Mavalon Limited
Claimant
Woodhill Care Limited
Claimant
Pembrokeshire County Council
Respondent
The Welsh Ministers
Interested Party
Older People's Commissioner for Wales
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pembrokeshire County Council lawfully set the 2010-11 care home fee rate
- 2 Whether the Council's methodology for setting fees was irrational or unlawful
- 3 Whether the Council unlawfully prevented claimants from seeking top-up payments from third parties
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's decision to set the 2010-11 fee rate at £390 was unlawful due to its conceded error in the treatment of capital costs, and the process failed to comply with statutory and guidance requirements for transparency and proper consideration of providers' costs. The Council must reconsider and lawfully set the fee rate. The Council's actions regarding third party contributions were not amenable to public law relief in this context.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Council's decision to set the 2010-11 fee rate at £390 quashed
- Council to reconsider and lawfully set the fee rate in accordance with statutory duties and guidance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment