COS v PER & Anor [2021] EWHC 475 (QB) (03 March 2021)

COS v PER & Anor [2021] EWHC 475 (QB) (03 March 2021)

The claimant is likely to succeed at trial in establishing that publication of the information should not be allowed, given the reasonable expectation of privacy, imminent threat of disclosure, and lack of any compelling Article 10 argument from the defendants; the flexible approach to s.12(3) applies due to the serious consequences and urgency.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 475
Parties
Claimant: COS; Defendant: PER; Defendant: PHO
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application / Out of Hours Hearing; Pre Trial
Outcome
Interim injunction granted until return date
Legal Topics
Interim Injunction, Misuse of Private Information, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Protection From Harassment Act 1997

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

COS

Claimant

PER

Defendant

PHO

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interim Injunction Application / Out of Hours Hearing; Pre Trial

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an interim injunction restraining publication of private information
  2. 2 Whether the claimant has a reasonable expectation of privacy
  3. 3 Whether the balance between Article 8 and Article 10 ECHR rights justifies the injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is likely to succeed at trial in establishing that publication of the information should not be allowed, given the reasonable expectation of privacy, imminent threat of disclosure, and lack of any compelling Article 10 argument from the defendants; the flexible approach to s.12(3) applies due to the serious consequences and urgency.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction granted until return date

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from publishing private information and other information detrimental to the claimant
  • Defendants ordered to remove a particular video from the internet