Agricultural Profiles Ltd v Performance & Deck Roofing Ltd
No binding compromise was reached because an essential term (clause 6 regarding payment under the CVA) remained unresolved and was not agreed by both parties. The correspondence and oral evidence demonstrated ongoing negotiation, not concluded agreement.
- Parties
- Claimant: Agricultural Profiles Limited; Defendant: Performance & Deck Roofing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue at Trial: Determination of Whether the Action Was Compromised by Settlement Agreement
- Outcome
- No compromise; action not settled; trial to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Compromise of Actions, Formation of Contract, Settlement Agreements, Binding Agreements, Essential Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agricultural Profiles Limited
Claimant
Performance & Deck Roofing Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue at Trial: Determination of Whether the Action Was Compromised by Settlement Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding compromise agreement was reached between the parties in November or December 2004
- 2 Whether all essential terms were agreed such that a binding contract existed
Ratio Decidendi
No binding compromise was reached because an essential term (clause 6 regarding payment under the CVA) remained unresolved and was not agreed by both parties. The correspondence and oral evidence demonstrated ongoing negotiation, not concluded agreement.
Court Disposition
No compromise; action not settled; trial to proceed.
Orders
- The action is not compromised; there is no binding agreement as alleged by APL.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment