Santander UK Plc v Harrison & Anor
The application for permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise an important point of principle or practice, nor is there any other compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. The judge below correctly analyzed the issue of whether the credit was in the form of a cash loan.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Santander UK PLC; Applicants/defendants: Harrison and Another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Appeal, Consumer Credit Act, Credit Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Santander UK PLC
Respondent/claimant
Harrison and Another
Applicants/defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal raises an important point of principle or practice under CPR 52.13(2)
- 2 Whether there is a compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear the case
- 3 Whether the judge below erred in the analysis of credit in the form of a cash loan
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise an important point of principle or practice, nor is there any other compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. The judge below correctly analyzed the issue of whether the credit was in the form of a cash loan.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment