Lederer & Ors v The Persons Listed At Schedule 1 & Ors [2019] EWHC 554 (Ch) (22 January 2019)
Security for costs ordered against corporate claimants as they failed to prove, on balance of probabilities, that such order would stifle their claim; claimants' evidence insufficient, and court applied discounts to estimated costs. No security ordered against individual claimant. General stay granted until 22 March 2019 due to police investigation into threats. Claimants required to serve claim form on investors by 1 April 2019 and pay security by same date or claims struck out.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 554 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Nicole Charlotte Lederer; Claimant: Purrinos Investment Limited; Claimant: Hannamay Investments Limited; Claimant: Hillam Property Holdings Limited; Claimant: Towton Limited; Defendant: Persons Listed at Schedule 1; Defendant: Persons Listed at Schedule 2; Defendant: Lendy Limited; Defendant: Saving Stream Security Holdings Limited; Defendant: Annika Kisby; Defendant: Victoria Liddell; Defendant: Tammy Wilkins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / First Case Management Conference (adjourned), Applications for Security for Costs and Stay
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered against second to fifth claimants; general stay granted; unless security paid by 1 April 2019, claims struck out; no security ordered against first claimant; no unless order for enforcement of £30,000 costs.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Case Management, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Warranty of Authority, Enforcement of Costs Orders, Stay of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicole Charlotte Lederer
Claimant
Purrinos Investment Limited
Claimant
Hannamay Investments Limited
Claimant
Hillam Property Holdings Limited
Claimant
Towton Limited
Claimant
Persons Listed at Schedule 1
Defendant
Persons Listed at Schedule 2
Defendant
Lendy Limited
Defendant
Saving Stream Security Holdings Limited
Defendant
Annika Kisby
Defendant
Victoria Liddell
Defendant
Tammy Wilkins
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / First Case Management Conference (adjourned), Applications for Security for Costs and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against claimants
- 2 Whether claimants' application for a general stay should be granted
- 3 Whether enforcement of outstanding costs order should proceed
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs ordered against corporate claimants as they failed to prove, on balance of probabilities, that such order would stifle their claim; claimants' evidence insufficient, and court applied discounts to estimated costs. No security ordered against individual claimant. General stay granted until 22 March 2019 due to police investigation into threats. Claimants required to serve claim form on investors by 1 April 2019 and pay security by same date or claims struck out.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered against second to fifth claimants; general stay granted; unless security paid by 1 April 2019, claims struck out; no security ordered against first claimant; no unless order for enforcement of £30,000 costs.
Orders
- General stay of proceedings until 22 March 2019.
- Claimants to serve claim form on investors by 1 April 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment