Barts Health NHS Trust v Persons Unknown [2025] EWHC 3230 (KB) (08 December 2025)
Interim injunctive relief is granted against persons unknown who perpetrated a cyberattack and exfiltrated confidential information, as the Claimant demonstrated a serious issue to be tried, likelihood of success, inadequacy of damages, and balance of convenience overwhelmingly favours relief. Private hearing, confidentiality orders, and service out of jurisdiction are strictly necessary and proportionate given the criminal nature of the Defendants' conduct and risk of further harm.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 3230 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Barts Health NHS Trust; Defendant: Persons Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Pre Action Injunction Application / Without Notice, Pre Claim Form, Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Injunction and ancillary orders granted as sought by Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Cyberattack, Breach of Confidence, Interim Injunctions, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Open Justice, Confidentiality Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barts Health NHS Trust
Claimant
Persons Unknown
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Pre Action Injunction Application / Without Notice, Pre Claim Form, Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim injunctive relief should be granted against persons unknown for misuse of confidential information exfiltrated in a cyberattack
- 2 Whether the hearing should be held in private and without notice
- 3 Whether ancillary confidentiality and service orders are justified
Ratio Decidendi
Interim injunctive relief is granted against persons unknown who perpetrated a cyberattack and exfiltrated confidential information, as the Claimant demonstrated a serious issue to be tried, likelihood of success, inadequacy of damages, and balance of convenience overwhelmingly favours relief. Private hearing, confidentiality orders, and service out of jurisdiction are strictly necessary and proportionate given the criminal nature of the Defendants' conduct and risk of further harm.
Court Disposition
Injunction and ancillary orders granted as sought by Claimant.
Orders
- Defendants prohibited from using, publishing, communicating, or disclosing exfiltrated information.
- Defendants prohibited from further attempts to obtain documents or data from Trust's IT systems.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment