Cardiff University v Persons Unknown [2025] EWHC 3584 (KB) (13 June 2025)
The University demonstrated a compelling need for injunctive relief to prevent further trespass and nuisance by unidentified protestors, based on repeated disruptive incidents, ongoing risk, and the inadequacy of alternative remedies. The injunction is necessary and proportionate, limited to specific land, and includes procedural safeguards. The University's property rights outweigh the protestors' Article 10 and 11 rights in this context, as the acts involved trespass and serious disruption. The possession claim is adjourned generally to preserve costs and procedural efficiency.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 3584 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cardiff University; Defendant: Persons Unknown; Interested Party: Mr Lawrence; Intervenor: European Legal Support Centre
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (injunction and Possession) / Judgment on Application for Interim and Final Injunction; Possession Claim Adjourned
- Outcome
- Injunction granted against persons unknown; possession claim adjourned generally.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions Against Persons Unknown, Trespass, Private Nuisance, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly, University Property Rights, Protest Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cardiff University
Claimant
Persons Unknown
Defendant
Mr Lawrence
Interested Party
European Legal Support Centre
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Civil (injunction and Possession) / Judgment on Application for Interim and Final Injunction; Possession Claim Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to injunctive relief against persons unknown to restrain trespass and nuisance on university land
- 2 Whether the proposed injunction is proportionate and compatible with Articles 10 and 11 ECHR (freedom of expression and assembly)
- 3 Whether the procedural requirements for injunctions against persons unknown are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The University demonstrated a compelling need for injunctive relief to prevent further trespass and nuisance by unidentified protestors, based on repeated disruptive incidents, ongoing risk, and the inadequacy of alternative remedies. The injunction is necessary and proportionate, limited to specific land, and includes procedural safeguards. The University's property rights outweigh the protestors' Article 10 and 11 rights in this context, as the acts involved trespass and serious disruption. The possession claim is adjourned generally to preserve costs and procedural efficiency.
Court Disposition
Injunction granted against persons unknown; possession claim adjourned generally.
Orders
- Defendants (persons unknown) are prohibited from entering, occupying, or remaining on specified university land for protest without consent.
- Defendants are prohibited from directly blocking, obstructing, or interfering with access to the land with intent to stop access.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment