Stuart Charles Daburn v Persons Unknown & Ors

Stuart Charles Daburn v Persons Unknown & Ors

Summary judgment is granted against all defaulting defendants except Persons Unknown Category 1, as the claimant has established personal and proprietary claims arising from a fraudulent cryptocurrency scheme, proper service was effected, and no defence was filed.

Parties
Claimant: Stuart Charles Daburn; Defendant: Persons Unknown Category 1; Defendant: Persons Unknown Category 2; Defendant: 4Word Solutions; Defendant: Court Leet Limited; Defendant: Riana Group Limited; Defendant: Kyrrex Limited; Defendant: Boxer Cart Ads Limited; Defendant: Greencode Connection Limited; Defendant: Purplesun Limited; Defendant: Giricon Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
Outcome
Summary judgment granted against defaulting defendants except Persons Unknown Category 1; proceedings against Category 1 stayed.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Unjust Enrichment, Constructive Trust, Service on Persons Unknown
Fraud Cryptocurrency Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Unlawful Means Conspiracy Unjust Enrichment Constructive Trust Service on Persons Unknown

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stuart Charles Daburn

Claimant

Persons Unknown Category 1

Defendant

Persons Unknown Category 2

Defendant

4Word Solutions

Defendant

Court Leet Limited

Defendant

Riana Group Limited

Defendant

Kyrrex Limited

Defendant

Boxer Cart Ads Limited

Defendant

Greencode Connection Limited

Defendant

Purplesun Limited

Defendant

Giricon Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should be granted against defaulting defendants in a cryptocurrency fraud claim
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction over persons unknown
  3. 3 Whether proprietary and personal claims are established

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment is granted against all defaulting defendants except Persons Unknown Category 1, as the claimant has established personal and proprietary claims arising from a fraudulent cryptocurrency scheme, proper service was effected, and no defence was filed.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted against defaulting defendants except Persons Unknown Category 1; proceedings against Category 1 stayed.

Orders

  • Judgment for damages for unlawful means conspiracy and proprietary claims against defaulting defendants.
  • Stay of proceedings against Persons Unknown Category 1 with liberty to restore.