ZAB v Persons Unknown

ZAB v Persons Unknown

Continuation of interim injunction and anonymity order is necessary and justified due to ongoing risk to sensitive data subjects, defendant's deliberate non-compliance, and to prevent encouragement of blackmail; alternative service validated as defendant was demonstrably aware; time for service abridged as no prejudice caused.

Parties
Claimant: ZAB; Defendant: Persons Unknown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Injunction Return Date Hearing
Outcome
interim injunction continued; anonymity order continued; retrospective validation and permission for alternative service granted; time for service abridged; directions for conclusion of claim granted
Legal Topics
Ransomware, Breach of Confidence, Anonymity Orders, Alternative Service, Interim Injunctions, Open Justice
Data Protection Privacy Civil Procedure Ransomware Breach of Confidence Anonymity Orders Alternative Service Interim Injunctions +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ZAB

Claimant

Persons Unknown

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Injunction Return Date Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether to continue interim injunction restraining use/disclosure of exfiltrated confidential information
  2. 2 whether to grant continued anonymity to claimant
  3. 3 whether to validate and permit alternative service

Ratio Decidendi

Continuation of interim injunction and anonymity order is necessary and justified due to ongoing risk to sensitive data subjects, defendant's deliberate non-compliance, and to prevent encouragement of blackmail; alternative service validated as defendant was demonstrably aware; time for service abridged as no prejudice caused.

Court Disposition

interim injunction continued; anonymity order continued; retrospective validation and permission for alternative service granted; time for service abridged; directions for conclusion of claim granted

Orders

  • Defendant restrained from using, publishing, communicating or disclosing exfiltrated confidential information
  • Defendant required to deliver up, delete, or destroy information and provide witness statement