UK Oil & Gas Investments Plc & Ors v Persons Unknown Who Are Protestors...
The court granted interim injunctions (in reduced and clarified terms) restraining unlawful protest activities at the Horse Hill and Broadford Bridge sites, finding a real and imminent risk of further wrongful acts (trespass, obstruction, targeting suppliers) and that the balance of rights under the ECHR did not justify such infringements. The 'persons unknown' procedure was appropriate given the nature of the protest groups. The injunction was not granted in relation to the Head Office, and certain overbroad or unclear terms were refused to avoid chilling lawful protest.
- Parties
- Claimant: UK Oil & Gas Investments PLC; Claimant: Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Limited; Claimant: Magellan Petroleum (UK) Limited; Claimant: Horse Hill Developments Ltd; Claimant: UKOG (GB) Limited; Defendant: Persons Unknown (various protestor groups); Defendant: Ms Ann Stewart; Defendant: Ms Sue Jameson; Defendant: Ms Natasha Doane; Defendant: Ms Vicki Elcoate; Defendant: Ms Constance Whiston; Defendant: Ms Jacqui Hamlin; Defendant: Friends of the Earth Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application (interim Injunction) / Ruling on Interim Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Interim injunctions granted in part (Horse Hill and Broadford Bridge sites only); refused as to Head Office; terms of injunction narrowed and clarified.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Protest Law, Trespass, Public Nuisance, Economic Torts, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UK Oil & Gas Investments PLC
Claimant
Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Limited
Claimant
Magellan Petroleum (UK) Limited
Claimant
Horse Hill Developments Ltd
Claimant
UKOG (GB) Limited
Claimant
Persons Unknown (various protestor groups)
Defendant
Ms Ann Stewart
Defendant
Ms Sue Jameson
Defendant
Ms Natasha Doane
Defendant
Ms Vicki Elcoate
Defendant
Ms Constance Whiston
Defendant
Ms Jacqui Hamlin
Defendant
Friends of the Earth Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Application (interim Injunction) / Ruling on Interim Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim injunctions should be granted against protestors (including persons unknown) at oil and gas exploration sites to restrain unlawful protest activities
- 2 Whether the use of 'persons unknown' procedure is appropriate and lawful in this context
- 3 Whether the terms of the proposed injunction are sufficiently clear, certain, and proportionate given the rights to protest under the Human Rights Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted interim injunctions (in reduced and clarified terms) restraining unlawful protest activities at the Horse Hill and Broadford Bridge sites, finding a real and imminent risk of further wrongful acts (trespass, obstruction, targeting suppliers) and that the balance of rights under the ECHR did not justify such infringements. The 'persons unknown' procedure was appropriate given the nature of the protest groups. The injunction was not granted in relation to the Head Office, and certain overbroad or unclear terms were refused to avoid chilling lawful protest.
Court Disposition
Interim injunctions granted in part (Horse Hill and Broadford Bridge sites only); refused as to Head Office; terms of injunction narrowed and clarified.
Orders
- Interim injunction restraining trespass, obstruction, slow walking, lorry surfing, and unlawful targeting of suppliers at Horse Hill and Broadford Bridge sites, in clarified terms.
- No injunction granted in relation to the Head Office.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment