R v Darren Stanley Feve
The sentence was unduly lenient because the seriousness of perverting the course of justice, especially in the context of a murder investigation, almost always requires immediate imprisonment. The judge erred in suspending the sentence as appropriate punishment could only be achieved by immediate custody. However, the court exercised its discretion not to increase the sentence due to the offender's compliance, health, and family circumstances.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Offender: Darren Stanley Feve
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- sentence found unduly lenient but not increased
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, Sentencing, Suspended Sentence, Unduly Lenient Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Darren Stanley Feve
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for perverting the course of justice was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether a suspended sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the offence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was unduly lenient because the seriousness of perverting the course of justice, especially in the context of a murder investigation, almost always requires immediate imprisonment. The judge erred in suspending the sentence as appropriate punishment could only be achieved by immediate custody. However, the court exercised its discretion not to increase the sentence due to the offender's compliance, health, and family circumstances.
Court Disposition
sentence found unduly lenient but not increased
Orders
- Leave to refer granted
- Sentence remains 12 months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months with 200 hours' unpaid work
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment