Boulter v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
The appellant's medical condition does not bar extradition under the Extradition Act 2003, and there is no evidence that extradition to Canada would breach his human rights under Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR, given the availability of adequate medical facilities and safeguards in Canada.
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Boulter; 1st Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; 2nd Respondent: Government of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Secretary of State's Extradition Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Medical Grounds for Extradition, Human Rights (article 3 and Article 8 Echr)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Boulter
Appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
1st Respondent
Government of Canada
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Secretary of State's Extradition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's medical condition bars extradition under the Extradition Act 2003
- 2 Whether extradition would breach the appellant's human rights under Article 3 and Article 8 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's medical condition does not bar extradition under the Extradition Act 2003, and there is no evidence that extradition to Canada would breach his human rights under Article 3 or Article 8 ECHR, given the availability of adequate medical facilities and safeguards in Canada.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against Secretary of State's extradition order dismissed.
- No extension of time granted for appeal against District Judge's decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment