PETER CHILVERS v REGINA

PETER CHILVERS v REGINA

The conviction is not unsafe for lack of a Brown direction because the particulars in count 1 were not individually essential ingredients of the offence but examples of controlling or coercive behaviour. The jury was properly directed to consider whether, in the round, the behaviour amounted to the actus reus of the offence. There was no realistic danger of a lack of unanimity on the essential ingredient, and a Brown direction was not required.

Parties
Appellant: Peter Chilvers; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Controlling or Coercive Behaviour, Jury Directions, Unanimity of Verdict, Brown Direction, Appeal Against Conviction
Criminal Law Controlling or Coercive Behaviour Jury Directions Unanimity of Verdict Brown Direction Appeal Against Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Chilvers

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction on count 1 (controlling or coercive behaviour) is unsafe due to the absence of a Brown direction in the jury summing up.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction is not unsafe for lack of a Brown direction because the particulars in count 1 were not individually essential ingredients of the offence but examples of controlling or coercive behaviour. The jury was properly directed to consider whether, in the round, the behaviour amounted to the actus reus of the offence. There was no realistic danger of a lack of unanimity on the essential ingredient, and a Brown direction was not required.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • extension of time and leave to appeal granted
  • appeal against conviction dismissed