Listing Officer v Bryant & Ors
The Tribunal erred in law by considering irrelevant factors such as the adequacy of washing facilities, the age and needs of the residents, the degree of communality, and the single access point. The only reasonable conclusion is that the bedsits were constructed or adapted for use as separate living accommodation and are self-contained units for council tax purposes.
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Clement (Listing Officer); Respondents: C B Bryant and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Council Tax, Valuation of Dwellings, Self Contained Units, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Clement (Listing Officer)
Appellant
C B Bryant and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 11 bedsits at Ty Gnoll, Dyfed Road, Neath are 'self-contained units' for council tax purposes under the Council Tax (Chargeable Dwellings) Order 1992
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by considering irrelevant factors such as the adequacy of washing facilities, the age and needs of the residents, the degree of communality, and the single access point. The only reasonable conclusion is that the bedsits were constructed or adapted for use as separate living accommodation and are self-contained units for council tax purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The Tribunal's decision is set aside.
- The valuation list is to be recertified as it previously stood, with the 11 bedsits entered as self-contained units.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment