Listing Officer v Bryant & Ors

Listing Officer v Bryant & Ors

The Tribunal erred in law by considering irrelevant factors such as the adequacy of washing facilities, the age and needs of the residents, the degree of communality, and the single access point. The only reasonable conclusion is that the bedsits were constructed or adapted for use as separate living accommodation and are self-contained units for council tax purposes.

Parties
Appellant: Peter Clement (Listing Officer); Respondents: C B Bryant and Others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Council Tax, Valuation of Dwellings, Self Contained Units, Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Clement (Listing Officer)

Appellant

C B Bryant and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Statutory Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Valuation Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether 11 bedsits at Ty Gnoll, Dyfed Road, Neath are 'self-contained units' for council tax purposes under the Council Tax (Chargeable Dwellings) Order 1992

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal erred in law by considering irrelevant factors such as the adequacy of washing facilities, the age and needs of the residents, the degree of communality, and the single access point. The only reasonable conclusion is that the bedsits were constructed or adapted for use as separate living accommodation and are self-contained units for council tax purposes.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The Tribunal's decision is set aside.
  • The valuation list is to be recertified as it previously stood, with the 11 bedsits entered as self-contained units.