Jemma Trust Company Ltd. v Liptrott & Anor (No.2)
The fair and reasonable charge for the solicitors' bills, considering all statutory factors, the complexity and duration of the estate administration, the conduct of the parties, and the guidance of the Court of Appeal, is £500,000. This includes a value element higher than the regressive scale but justified by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jemma Trust Company Limited; Defendant: Peter D’Arcy Liptrott; Defendant: John Forrester
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Assessment of Solicitors' Bills (non Contentious Probate) / Costs Judge's Reserved Judgment After Court of Appeal Guidance
- Outcome
- Solicitors' bills assessed at £500,000 as fair and reasonable remuneration for work done to date, with a 5% reduction for duplication. No further deductions ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors' Remuneration, Assessment of Costs, Value Element in Legal Fees, Non Contentious Business, Executor's Duties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jemma Trust Company Limited
Claimant
Peter D’Arcy Liptrott
Defendant
John Forrester
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Assessment of Solicitors' Bills (non Contentious Probate) / Costs Judge's Reserved Judgment After Court of Appeal Guidance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solicitors can charge a value element in addition to hourly rates for non-contentious probate work
- 2 What is a fair and reasonable remuneration for solicitors in the administration of an estate under the Solicitors’ (Non Contentious) Remuneration Order 1994
- 3 Whether specific deductions should be made for alleged duplication, lack of records, or other alleged inefficiencies in the bills rendered
Ratio Decidendi
The fair and reasonable charge for the solicitors' bills, considering all statutory factors, the complexity and duration of the estate administration, the conduct of the parties, and the guidance of the Court of Appeal, is £500,000. This includes a value element higher than the regressive scale but justified by the circumstances. A 5% reduction was made for duplication between Mr Liptrott and Mr Marriott. No further deductions were warranted for the other objections raised.
Court Disposition
Solicitors' bills assessed at £500,000 as fair and reasonable remuneration for work done to date, with a 5% reduction for duplication. No further deductions ordered.
Orders
- Solicitors' bills reduced to a total of £500,000 for the period in question.
- No further deductions for specific objections or alleged inefficiencies.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment