Phaestos Ltd v Ho & Ors
The court retains jurisdiction to summarily assess costs reserved to itself, even after acceptance of a Part 36 offer, provided such assessment is consistent with the terms of the settlement. The claimants are ordered to pay the defendants' costs on the standard basis, summarily assessed at £86,000.
- Parties
- Claimant: Phaestos Limited; Claimant: Mindimaxnox LLP; Claimant: IKOS CIF Limited; Defendant: Peter Ho; Defendant: Tobin Maxwell Gover
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Settlement Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs summarily assessed; claimants ordered to pay defendants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Part 36 Offers, Summary Assessment, Settlement, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phaestos Limited
Claimant
Mindimaxnox LLP
Claimant
IKOS CIF Limited
Claimant
Peter Ho
Defendant
Tobin Maxwell Gover
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Settlement Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court retains jurisdiction to summarily assess costs after acceptance of a Part 36 offer
- 2 Whether reserved costs from prior hearings are covered by the Part 36 settlement
- 3 Appropriate basis and quantum for costs assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The court retains jurisdiction to summarily assess costs reserved to itself, even after acceptance of a Part 36 offer, provided such assessment is consistent with the terms of the settlement. The claimants are ordered to pay the defendants' costs on the standard basis, summarily assessed at £86,000.
Court Disposition
Costs summarily assessed; claimants ordered to pay defendants' costs.
Orders
- Claimants to pay defendants £86,000 in costs within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment