Nina Angelova v Peter John Holden Kershaw & Anor
The Will failed to reflect the testator’s clear and consistent instructions, as evidenced by the Revised Plan and the Letter of Wishes, due to a clerical error by the drafting solicitor. The error was not noticed by the testator before execution, and there is no evidence his intentions changed. Rectification is therefore ordered.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nina Angelova; Defendant: Peter John Holden Kershaw; Defendant: David Clark
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/rectification of Will / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Will rectified as sought by the claimant
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Will, Clerical Error, Testator's Intentions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nina Angelova
Claimant
Peter John Holden Kershaw
Defendant
David Clark
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/rectification of Will / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 15.11.a of the Will should be rectified under section 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 to reflect the testator's true intentions regarding Nina Angelova's entitlement under the BCT trust.
Ratio Decidendi
The Will failed to reflect the testator’s clear and consistent instructions, as evidenced by the Revised Plan and the Letter of Wishes, due to a clerical error by the drafting solicitor. The error was not noticed by the testator before execution, and there is no evidence his intentions changed. Rectification is therefore ordered.
Court Disposition
Will rectified as sought by the claimant
Orders
- Clause 15.11.a of the Will is rectified to read: 'Nina Angelova, whether or not we are married at the date of my death.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment