Gandy v King [2010] EWHC 90177 (Costs) (25 June 2010)
The claim did not conclude at trial as the trial never commenced; settlement was reached before any hearing or opening. The appropriate success fee for solicitor and counsel is 20%, reflecting the actual risks at the time the CFA was entered into, with no justification for higher uplifts based on quantum, causation, or Part 36 risks in this case.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 90177 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Steven Gandy (a patient suing by his litigation friend, Christine Chester); Defendant: Peter King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment Following Personal Injury Settlement / Detailed Assessment of Costs
- Outcome
- Success fees for solicitor and both counsel allowed at 20%. Defendant entitled to costs of detailed assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, Detailed Assessment, Part 36 Offers, Risk Assessment in Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Gandy (a patient suing by his litigation friend, Christine Chester)
Claimant
Peter King
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Following Personal Injury Settlement / Detailed Assessment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim concluded 'at trial' for the purposes of the CFA success fee trigger
- 2 What is the appropriate level of success fee for solicitor and counsel under the CFA given the risks at the time of agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The claim did not conclude at trial as the trial never commenced; settlement was reached before any hearing or opening. The appropriate success fee for solicitor and counsel is 20%, reflecting the actual risks at the time the CFA was entered into, with no justification for higher uplifts based on quantum, causation, or Part 36 risks in this case.
Court Disposition
Success fees for solicitor and both counsel allowed at 20%. Defendant entitled to costs of detailed assessment.
Orders
- Success fees at items 107, 108, and 109 of the bill allowed at 20%.
- Defendant entitled to costs of detailed assessment; if not agreed, costs to be summarily assessed after submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment