Gandy v King
The claim did not conclude at trial as the trial did not commence; therefore, 100% success fee is not triggered. The appropriate success fee for solicitor and counsel is 20%, reflecting an 80-85% chance of success and low risk at the time the CFA was entered into. High quantum and causation issues do not justify additional percentage increases; Part 36 risk was minimal.
- Parties
- Claimant: Steven Gandy (a patient suing by his litigation friend, Christine Chester); Defendant: Peter King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Judgment After Detailed Assessment Hearing
- Outcome
- Success fees for solicitor, Leading Counsel, and Junior Counsel allowed at 20%. Defendant entitled to costs of detailed assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, Detailed Assessment, Part 36 Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Gandy (a patient suing by his litigation friend, Christine Chester)
Claimant
Peter King
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Judgment After Detailed Assessment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim concluded 'at trial' for purposes of triggering 100% success fee under CFA
- 2 Appropriate level of success fees for solicitor and counsel under CFA given risk assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The claim did not conclude at trial as the trial did not commence; therefore, 100% success fee is not triggered. The appropriate success fee for solicitor and counsel is 20%, reflecting an 80-85% chance of success and low risk at the time the CFA was entered into. High quantum and causation issues do not justify additional percentage increases; Part 36 risk was minimal.
Court Disposition
Success fees for solicitor, Leading Counsel, and Junior Counsel allowed at 20%. Defendant entitled to costs of detailed assessment.
Orders
- Success fees for solicitor, Leading Counsel, and Junior Counsel allowed at 20%.
- Defendant entitled to costs of detailed assessment; if not agreed, parties to file statements and objections for summary assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment