Bootes & Ors v Ceart Risk Services Ltd [2012] EWHC 1178 (Ch) (03 May 2012)
Failure to obtain FSA consent prior to appointment of administrators is a curable defect; the appointment takes effect when FSA written consent is filed with the court, and acts of administrators prior to that filing are validated by paragraph 104 of Schedule B1.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1178 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Lloyd Bootes; Applicant: Jeremy Charles Frost; Applicant: Stephen Patrick Jens Wadstead; Respondent: Ceart Risk Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application / Judgment on Application for Declaration Regarding Validity of Administrators' Appointment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Administrators, Defective Appointment, Regulatory Consent, Validation of Acts, Retrospective Effect
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Lloyd Bootes
Applicant
Jeremy Charles Frost
Applicant
Stephen Patrick Jens Wadstead
Applicant
Ceart Risk Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Judgment on Application for Declaration Regarding Validity of Administrators' Appointment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrators appointed without prior FSA consent are validly appointed under paragraph 22 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether subsequent FSA consent cures the defect in appointment
- 3 Whether acts of administrators prior to valid appointment are validated by paragraph 104 of Schedule B1
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to obtain FSA consent prior to appointment of administrators is a curable defect; the appointment takes effect when FSA written consent is filed with the court, and acts of administrators prior to that filing are validated by paragraph 104 of Schedule B1.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted
Orders
- The appointment of the Administrators took effect when the FSA's consent to their appointment was filed with Croydon County Court.
- Notwithstanding the defect in their appointment on 19 January 2012, the Administrators' acts between that date and the date when the FSA's consent to their appointment was filed with Croydon County Court were valid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment