Bootes & Ors v Ceart Risk Services Ltd
Failure to obtain prior FSA consent constitutes a curable defect in the appointment of administrators; the appointment takes effect when the FSA's written consent is filed with the court, and acts prior to valid appointment are validated by paragraph 104 of Schedule B1.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Lloyd Bootes; Applicant: Jeremy Charles Frost; Applicant: Stephen Patrick Jens Wadstead; Respondent: Ceart Risk Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Administrators, Regulatory Consent, Validation of Acts, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Lloyd Bootes
Applicant
Jeremy Charles Frost
Applicant
Stephen Patrick Jens Wadstead
Applicant
Ceart Risk Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrators were validly appointed without prior FSA consent
- 2 Whether subsequent FSA consent cures defect in appointment
- 3 Whether acts prior to valid appointment are valid under paragraph 104 of Schedule B1
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to obtain prior FSA consent constitutes a curable defect in the appointment of administrators; the appointment takes effect when the FSA's written consent is filed with the court, and acts prior to valid appointment are validated by paragraph 104 of Schedule B1.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Declaration that the appointment of the Administrators took effect when the FSA’s consent was filed with Croydon County Court
- Declaration that the Administrators’ acts between 19 January 2012 and the date of filing of FSA consent were valid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment