Craig Wright v Peter McCormack
Dr Wright's conduct in advancing a deliberately false case justified nominal damages, no injunctive relief, refusal of permission to appeal, and indemnity costs against him except for prior costs orders, while breach of embargo required contempt proceedings.
- Parties
- Claimant: Craig Wright; Defendant: Peter McCormack
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Judgment Addressing Ancillary Matters
- Outcome
- Summons for contempt proceedings issued; no injunctive relief; permission to appeal refused; indemnity costs awarded against Dr Wright except for prior costs orders.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Damages, Injunctive Relief, Contempt of Court, Costs, Appeal Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Craig Wright
Claimant
Peter McCormack
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Judgment Addressing Ancillary Matters
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Wright breached the embargo on the draft judgment
- 2 Whether injunctive relief should be granted to restrain Mr McCormack from repeating defamatory statements
- 3 Whether Dr Wright should have permission to appeal the nominal damages award
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Wright's conduct in advancing a deliberately false case justified nominal damages, no injunctive relief, refusal of permission to appeal, and indemnity costs against him except for prior costs orders, while breach of embargo required contempt proceedings.
Court Disposition
Summons for contempt proceedings issued; no injunctive relief; permission to appeal refused; indemnity costs awarded against Dr Wright except for prior costs orders.
Orders
- Dr Wright to attend directions hearing for contempt proceedings regarding embargo breach.
- No injunctive relief granted; undertaking by Mr McCormack not accepted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment