Alta Trading UK Limited & Ors v Peter Miles Bosworth & Ors
Dishonesty allegations may be relevant to causation in the damages inquiry; Defendants should be given opportunity to plead their position precisely before any strike-out decision. Application to strike out is adjourned to allow further pleadings.
- Parties
- Claimant: ALTA TRADING UK LIMITED (formerly known as ARCADIA PETROLEUM LIMITED); Claimant: ARCADIA ENERGY (SUISSE) SA; Claimant: ARCADIA ENERGY PTE. LTD.; Claimant: FARAHEAD HOLDINGS LIMITED; Defendant: PETER MILES BOSWORTH; Defendant: COLIN HURLEY; Defendant: STEPHEN CLIVE LANGFORD GIBBONS; Defendant: MARK RICHARD LANCE; Defendant: STEVEN KELBRICK; Defendant: SALEM CHUCRI MOUNZER; Defendant: ARCADIA PETROLEUM SAL OFFSHORE; Defendant: ARCADIA PETROLEUM LIMITED, MAURITIUS; Defendant: ATTOCK OIL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, MAURITIUS; Defendant: THE CORNHILL GROUP LIMITED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Application to Strike Out Allegations
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dishonesty allegations adjourned; Defendants to amend pleadings on causation relevance.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Damages Inquiry, Strike Out Applications, Dishonesty Allegations, Causation, Mitigation, Aggravated Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ALTA TRADING UK LIMITED (formerly known as ARCADIA PETROLEUM LIMITED)
Claimant
ARCADIA ENERGY (SUISSE) SA
Claimant
ARCADIA ENERGY PTE. LTD.
Claimant
FARAHEAD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Claimant
PETER MILES BOSWORTH
Defendant
COLIN HURLEY
Defendant
STEPHEN CLIVE LANGFORD GIBBONS
Defendant
MARK RICHARD LANCE
Defendant
STEVEN KELBRICK
Defendant
SALEM CHUCRI MOUNZER
Defendant
ARCADIA PETROLEUM SAL OFFSHORE
Defendant
ARCADIA PETROLEUM LIMITED, MAURITIUS
Defendant
ATTOCK OIL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, MAURITIUS
Defendant
THE CORNHILL GROUP LIMITED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Application to Strike Out Allegations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether dishonesty allegations should be struck out in the context of an inquiry into damages caused by a freezing order
- 2 Relevance of dishonesty allegations to causation, mitigation, aggravated damages, interest, costs, and public interest
Ratio Decidendi
Dishonesty allegations may be relevant to causation in the damages inquiry; Defendants should be given opportunity to plead their position precisely before any strike-out decision. Application to strike out is adjourned to allow further pleadings.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dishonesty allegations adjourned; Defendants to amend pleadings on causation relevance.
Orders
- Strike-out application adjourned pending Defendants' draft amendments to Replies on causation.
- Parties to be heard on appropriate directions for further pleadings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment