Robinson, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1637 (01 December 2022)

Robinson, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1637 (01 December 2022)

The judge was entitled to categorise the offence as Category 1A due to serious psychological harm and significant force; no reduction was required for attempt as the harm was completed; mitigation was considered but outweighed by aggravating factors.

Citation
[2022] EWCA Crim 1637
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Peter Robinson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 December 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Attempted Robbery, Sentencing, Mitigation, Psychological Harm, Categorisation of Offence
Criminal Law Attempted Robbery Sentencing Mitigation Psychological Harm Categorisation of Offence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Peter Robinson

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the offence was correctly categorised as Category 1A under sentencing guidelines
  2. 2 Whether sufficient reduction was given for the offence being attempted rather than completed robbery
  3. 3 Whether the judge properly considered mitigation in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to categorise the offence as Category 1A due to serious psychological harm and significant force; no reduction was required for attempt as the harm was completed; mitigation was considered but outweighed by aggravating factors.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed