Bramwell & Ors v Robinson [2016] EWHC B26 (Ch) (21 October 2016)
The prescriptive right of way is limited to the track itself, with a right to pass at PP2 only. No time or weight restrictions apply. Defendant's conduct constituted actionable interference and harassment. Most speed bumps and certain wooden posts must be removed. Gates must be left open except in emergency or until cattle grid is repaired. Damages awarded for loss of rent and distress. Counterclaim for excessive user dismissed.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC B26 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Peter Bramwell; Claimant: Gwendoline Mabel Bramwell; Claimant: Low Meadows Equestrian Centre Limited; Defendant: Peter Robinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Right of Way Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Prescriptive Easements, Interference With Right of Way, Harassment, Damages, Counterclaim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Bramwell
Claimant
Gwendoline Mabel Bramwell
Claimant
Low Meadows Equestrian Centre Limited
Claimant
Peter Robinson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Right of Way Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Extent of prescriptive right of way
- 2 Interference with right of way
- 3 Harassment
Ratio Decidendi
The prescriptive right of way is limited to the track itself, with a right to pass at PP2 only. No time or weight restrictions apply. Defendant's conduct constituted actionable interference and harassment. Most speed bumps and certain wooden posts must be removed. Gates must be left open except in emergency or until cattle grid is repaired. Damages awarded for loss of rent and distress. Counterclaim for excessive user dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant must remove all speed bumps except five specified locations.
- Defendant must remove wooden posts WP22–WP25.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment