Smith v Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd & Anor
The Recorder's ongoing professional connection with the KCF group gave rise to an appearance of bias, and Mr Smith did not validly waive his right to object because he was not given all relevant information or a fair opportunity to make an unpressured decision. The interests of justice required that permission to appeal out of time be granted and the case be retried before a different judge.
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Smith; Respondent: Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd; Intervener: The Bar Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Apparent Bias, Waiver of Objection, Fair Trial, Extension of Time for Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Smith
Appellant
Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd
Respondent
The Bar Council
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Recorder's professional connection with the respondent gave rise to an appearance of bias
- 2 Whether the appellant validly waived his right to object to the Recorder hearing the case
- 3 Whether permission to appeal out of time should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder's ongoing professional connection with the KCF group gave rise to an appearance of bias, and Mr Smith did not validly waive his right to object because he was not given all relevant information or a fair opportunity to make an unpressured decision. The interests of justice required that permission to appeal out of time be granted and the case be retried before a different judge.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted out of time
- Recorder’s decision quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment