Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica)

Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica)

The appeal was dismissed because the recognition evidence was overwhelmingly strong, the absence of an identification parade did not prejudice the appellant, and the failure to provide a good character direction did not result in a miscarriage of justice.

Parties
Appellant: Peter Stewart; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Identification Evidence, Good Character Direction, Miscarriage of Justice
Criminal Law Murder Identification Evidence Good Character Direction Miscarriage of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Stewart

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the absence of an identification parade and alleged dock identification rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the failure to provide a good character direction resulted in a miscarriage of justice

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the recognition evidence was overwhelmingly strong, the absence of an identification parade did not prejudice the appellant, and the failure to provide a good character direction did not result in a miscarriage of justice.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.